Ischemic Compression Technique Versus Myofascial Release of Upper Trapezius Muscle in Mechanical Neck Pain in Females of Jouf University

Zeinab A. Ali, Amera Bekhatroh Rashed, Nevin Adel Amer Ismael, Hanaa Elsayed Ahmed Shahin, Anwar Abdullah Alshara-ri, Eman Elsayed Bauomey Mohamed, Radwa T ELshor-bagy, Nesma M Allam

Zeinab A. Ali, Amera Bekhatroh Rashed, Nevin Adel Amer Ismael, Hanaa Elsayed Ahmed Shahin, Anwar Abdullah Alshara-ri, Eman Elsayed Bauomey Mohamed, Radwa T ELshor-bagy, Nesma M Allam – Ischemic Compression Technique Versus Myofascial Release of Upper Trapezius Muscle in Mechanical Neck Pain in Females of Jouf University . Fizjoterapia Polska 2021; 21(3); 156-162

Abstract
Background. Neck pain can have an insidious [mechanical] or traumatic onset. Mechanical neck pain is defined as pain in the cervical spine and shoulder area with symptoms of neck position, movements or contact with cervical muscles. Aim. is to compare the effect of ischaemic compres-sion (IC) and myoficial release of the trapezius muscle in patients with mechanical neck pain. Mate-rials and methods. A two-week randomized experimental study. Thirty female patients who had mechanical neck pain, aged from 18 to 55 years old, were randomized into 2 equal groups. Group A received myofascial release technique plus cryotherapy for two weeks, 3 sessions per week., while Group B received ischemic compression plus cryotherapy for two weeks, 3 sessions per week. All participants in both groups were evaluated before and after training for Visual Analog scale (VAS), Neck disability index (NDI) and cervical range of motion by Universal Goniometer. Re-sults. There was a significant decrease in VAS and NDI post treatment in the group A and B com-pared with that pretreatment (p > 0.05). There was a significant increase in neck ROM post treat-ment in the group B and A compared with that pretreatment (p > 0.001). Comparison between the group A and B post treatment revealed a significant decrease in VAS and NDI of the group B com-pared with that of the group A (p > 0.05). Also, there was a significant increase in flexion, exten-sion, side bending, and rotation of the group B compared with that of the group A (p > 0.001). Con-clusions. It was concluded that application of ischemic compression 3 times / weeks for 2 weeks is an effective short-term method to reduce pain, increasing cervical ROM, and functional abilities of patients with mechanical neck pain.
Key words:
Ischemic Compression, Mechanical neck pain, Myofascial Trigger Point
Pobierz/Download/下載/Cкачиваете Download for free (only English version)

Muscle Energy Technique versus Static Stretch on Forward Head Posture in patients with Mechanical Neck pain: Randomized controlled trial

Haidy S. Roshdy, Maher A. Elkeblawy, Soheir S. Rezkallah, Mohmed M. Elkeblawy

Haidy S. Roshdy, Maher A. Elkeblawy, Soheir S. Rezkallah, Mohmed M. Elkeblawy – Muscle Energy Technique versus Static Stretch on Forward Head Posture in patients with Mechanical Neck pain: Randomized controlled trial. Fizjoterapia Polska 2020; 20(5); 208-214

Abstract
Background. Mechanical neck pain (MNP) is one of the most common disorders that originates from poor postural habits and bad ergonomics. Forward head posture (FHP) was highly correlated to MNP. Muscle energy technique (MET) and stretching are easy widespread therapeutic techniques that are known for their effects in improving tissue extensibility, relieving pain and promoting function.
Objective. A randomized controlled trial was designed to compare the effect of MET versus static stretching in terms of FHP, pain and disability in patients with MNP.
Methods. Thirty participants (3 males and 27 females, 18-30 years old) were randomly allocated into one of 3 groups: group (A) received MET+ hydrocollator pack+ postural education, group (B) received stretching and strengthening exercises+ hydrocollator pack+ postural education, group (C) control group received hydrocollator pack+ postural education, 3 sessions /week for 4 weeks. Evaluation was done pre-treatment, post-treatment and after 6-weeks of follow-up. Results: There were significant improvement (p<0.05) in all tested variables in all groups post-treatment except disability in control group. There was significant improvement of pain in all groups, disability in experimental groups and FHP in stretching group only at the follow-up. There were no significant differences between groups in all measured variables.
Conclusion. MET has equal effect to that of static stretching regarding pain and function even after 6-weeks of follow-up. Stretching showed better improvement in FHP correction that persists. Postural education is effective in pain management and seems to have a role in preserving long-term outcome.
Key words:
Forward Head Posture, Mechanical Neck Pain, Muscle Energy Technique, Static stretching, Visual Analogue Scale, Neck Disability Index, Craniovertebral angle
Pobierz/Download/下載/Cкачиваете Pobierz bezpłatnie artykuł w j. angielskim