Evaluating the effectiveness of mechanical methods on the basis of published reports

Mirosław Kokosz, Edward Saulicz, Janusz Kubacki

Mirosław Kokosz, Edward Saulicz, Janusz Kubacki – Evaluating the effectiveness of mechanical methods on the basis of published reports. Fizjoterapia Polska 2003; 3(4); 347-356

Abstract

Background. Movement based-therapy is becoming increasing popular. In fact, it can be said to be dominant modality in contemporary kinesitherapy. One of the most important criteria justifying the use of a particular therapeutic method is its clinical suitability. In this article, we attempted to establish the effectiveness of mechanical methods on the basis of a literature search. For this purpose we used our own system of evaluating the quality of published reports.Material and methods. We analyzed 20 articles from the literature devoted to the problem of evaluated the effectiveness of mechanical methods. The research reports were then ranked on the basis of the authors’ own method of evaluating their quality.Results. The results of our meta-analysis suggest that kinesitherapeutic methods are more effective than individual treatment methods used in isolation. Conclusions. A literature search in the available data bases produces numerous works discussing therapeutic techniques or diagnostic methods. There are relatively few articles, however, that evaluate the effectiveness of movement-based therapy. There are no unified criteria for the evaluation of effectivenessm which means that in the analysis of outcomes achieved from using one and the same kinesitherapeutic method there are major discrepancies in the results obtained by different authors.

Key words:
kinesithearpy, meta-analysis, manual therapy
Invalid download ID. Pobierz bezpłatnie artykuł w j. angielskim

Body Weight Support Treadmill Training – a systematic review of meta-analyses

Marcin Błaszcz, Beata Stach

M.Błaszcz, B. Stach – Body Weight Support Treadmill Training – a systematic review of meta-analyses. Fizjoterapia Polska 2020; 20(1); 66-77

Abstract
Aim. Although the effectiveness of Body Weight Support Treadmill Training has already been confirmed in various patients, its superiority over other physiotherapeutic interventions is unclear. The aim of this review was to compare the effectiveness of BWSTT in relation to other methods in various patients group.
Material and methods. A systematic review of meta-analyses was performed with: Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, MEDLINE and PEDro from the beginning until January 2019. 1775 publications were identified, of which 4 metaanalyses and one systematic review were included.
Results. BWSTT was more effective than other physiotherapeutic interventions in short-term increasing gait endurance and speed in stroke patients walking independently, and in improving functionality after hip replacement. In terms of: increasing the chance of independent walking, improving gait endurance and speed in dependent stroke patients; increasing walking distance and speed after a spinal cord injury and increasing the walking speed and cadence and stride length in Parkinson’s disease BWSTT was not more effective than standard physiotherapy.
Conclusion. The use of BWSTT may be beneficial for stroke patients who walk independently and at people after hip replacement. In the other areas, insufficient evidences were found.

Key words:
Body Weight Support Treadmill Training, gait, body weight support, systematic review, meta-analysis

Pobierz/Download/下載/Cкачиваете 免費下載(僅限英文版)