Static Magnetic Stimulation Versus Conventional Treatment on Cross Sectional Area of Quadriceps Muscle in Knee Osteoarthritis Patients: A Randomized Controlled Study

Haytham M. Elhafez, Sohier S. Rizkallah, Magda R. Zahran, Doaa S. Mostafa, Ahmed F Geneidy

Haytham M. Elhafez, Sohier S. Rizkallah, Magda R. Zahran, Doaa S. Mostafa, Ahmed F Geneidy – Static Magnetic Stimulation Versus Conventional Treatment on Cross Sectional Area of Quadriceps Muscle in Knee Osteoarthritis Patients: A Randomized Controlled Study. Fizjoterapia Polska 2021; 21(2); 216-222

Abstract
Background. Quadriceps femoris muscle significantly affected knee osteoarthritic patients. Weakness and atrophy occur as a result of muscle unloading and dysfunction. As the maximum force produced by a muscle has a direct proportion to its cross-sectional area (CSA), the current study revealed that static magnetic stimulation (SMS) is beneficial for improving CSA of the quadriceps muscle. Purpose. To examine the influence of magnetic stimulation on CSA of the quadriceps muscle in knee osteoarthritis patients and hence knee function. Materials and Methods. This study adopted a randomized controlled trial design. Twenty-four patients with both knee osteoarthritis (Grades II and III) participated. The participants, aged between 45–55 years, were randomly assigned to two groups. Group (A) received magnetic first stimulation in addition to selected physical therapy consisting of ultrasound device and isometric exercise for quadriceps. Group (B) received selected physical therapy consisting of ultrasound device and isometric exercise for quadriceps only. Two therapeutic sessions were given weekly for three consecutive weeks. Outcome measures were CSA of quadriceps at both sides and Lysholm knee scoring for assessment of the functional ability of the knee joint. These measures were taken before and after three consecutive weeks of intervention. Results. Within groups, the analysis showed a statistically significant increase for all measured variables in the two studied groups (p < 0.05). Between groups, the analysis revealed that quadriceps at both side and Lyshlom were significant increase in group (A) compared to group (B). Conclusions. Adding SMS to quadriceps strengthening exercises improved the CSA of quadriceps, which protects muscle from being atrophied and hence improved the knee joint functions more than quadriceps strengthening exercises alone.
Key words:
Electromyostimulation, Knee osteoarthritis, Quadriceps femoris, Strengthening exercises
Pobierz/Download/下載/Cкачиваете 免費下載(僅限英文版)

Effect of Forward Head Posture Correction Added to Lumber Stabilization Exercises on Lumbopelvic Organization in Mechanical Low Back Pain Patients: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Aliaa M Elabd, Ahmed I Elerian, Salah-Eldin B Ahmed, Haytham M Elhafez, Ahmed F Geneidy, Ahmed Atteya Ashour, Omar M Elabd

Aliaa M Elabd, Ahmed I Elerian, Salah-Eldin B Ahmed, Haytham M Elhafez, Ahmed F Geneidy, Ahmed Atteya Ashour, Omar M Elabd – Effect of Forward Head Posture Correction Added to Lumber Stabilization Exercises on Lumbopelvic Organization in Mechanical Low Back Pain Patients: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Fizjoterapia Polska 2020; 20(3); 132-140

Abstract
Background. Although current Lumbar Stabilization Exercises (LSEs) is beneficial for chronic mechanical low back pain (CMLBP), further research is recommended focusing on normalizing sagittal lumbopelvic alignment. Subjects with forward head posture (FHP) possibly have a problem with the regulation of static upright posture.
Purpose. This study was conducted to determine the effects of adding FHP correction to LSEs on pain, functions and lumbopelvic sagittal alignment in CMLBP patients.
Materials and Methods. Forty adult patients with CMLBP and FHP were assigned into one of two groups. Group A received FHP correction exercises in addition to LSEs for 12 weeks, while group B received only lumber stabilization for 12 weeks. The primary outcome was lumber lordosis (LL). Secondary outcomes included pain intensity, back specific physical functioning, cranio-vertebral angle (CVA), pelvic tilt (PT), pelvic incidence (PI), and sacral slope (SS). Patients were assessed pre and post treatment by an assessor blinded to the patients’ allocation. Reported data was analyzed by Mixed-model-MANOVA.
Results. MANOVA indicated a significant group-by-time interaction (P= 0.00, Partial η2= 0.65). LL, Pain, and SS were reduced in group A more than B. Physical function, CVA, and PT were increased in A when compared to B. There was no significant group-by-time interaction for PI. Within-group comparisons revealed significant differences for all measured variables in both groups except for CVA and PI in the control one.
Conclusion. The addition of FHP correction to LSEs for management of CMLBP seemed to positively affect pain, functioning, and lumbopelvic organization.
Key words:
Exercises, Low Back Pain, Posture, Stabilization
Pobierz/Download/下載/Cкачиваете 免費下載(僅限英文版)